Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 13 – Revenant

March 7th, 2009 by Brianna

This episode seemed very short and simple. I’m sure it was just as long as the others, but not much happened, so it seemed short. That’s okay, though. Simple is good.

Anyway, the ghost story thing. Couple was estranged in death, so they possess the bodies of the nearest handy living people to be reunited. Yes, this has been done before. But they did it pretty well, and I happen to have a soft spot for that sort of thing – so I really liked it. There’s really not much to say about the main plot, though.

Two things: First, isn’t it interesting how the wizards are obviously stronger than both the seeker and confessor combined? It’s as if the seeker is only important because of the prophecies. It’s an interesting concept, really. I tend to be a bit obsessed with free will, myself, and the idea that there might not be any bothers me. That said, there is a sort of romantic thrill to this idea of determinism, though – especially when it’s wrapped up in a prophecy. We know Richard is going to kill the bad guy, but does it matter how much or little of a hero he is otherwise?  They need to explore this more.

Second, I loved the ending bit. “Oh, look, a tracking cloud.” “I’ll cast a simple spell to get rid of it.” There’s <i>got</i> to be more to this than that!

Much better than last week’s!

Dollhouse, Episode 3

March 2nd, 2009 by Brianna

Yay! I really liked this one! According to those who have watched lots of movies (not me), the whole obsessed-fan-wants-to-kill-star plot has been done too much before, but I didn’t notice. It seemed more original than the last one, too. Plus, it was actually fun. Echo telling the singer off was great, some of the intra-handler lines were funny, and it was generally nice to get away from the sex slavery theme for just a minute.

I also liked that they managed to show some of the previous personalities, without resorting to sledgehammer tactics (flashbacks, groaning and falling down, etc) It all felt very clean and natural.

Could have done without so much of the dancing in lingerie, though. And the FBI dude is still boring.

Getting better!

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 12 – Home

February 24th, 2009 by Brianna

It’s bottle show time! I was really interested to see how this one would turn out. If Xena did anything at all right, it was the exceptional bottle shows. (‘The Xena Scrolls’, etc). I’d hoped LotS would continue this tradition. It didn’t.

The whole trick to bottle shows is to find an excuse to show a bunch of flashbacks. “Tell us the story of your dream!” is not a good excuse. Rahl’s assistant provided boring and useless commentary. And where did Anna come from? He seemed awfully in love to never mention her.

I did like the opening bit. It felt like it was poking fun at the “and he woke up. It had all been a dream.” But the teaser went on for almost a quarter of the episode. Boring!

The middle was – even more boring. And the ending didn’t make any sense. It all happened too fast, for one thing. It also seemed like a bit of a ripoff of the last scene in the Matrix. A longer buildup would have helped, I think.

Yay! for true love, I guess.

Question: If they could get to the box so fast, why didn’t Zedd and Kahlan just go move it without Richard?

Oh, well. You can’t expect too much from a bottle show.

Dollhouse, Episode 2 – The Target

February 21st, 2009 by Brianna

I cannot believe they did “The Most Dangerous Game”. Stupid, stupid, stupid! Look – everyone tries to do that. Yes, it’s classic. Yes, it’s powerful. It’s also boring. They didn’t even bother to put a different twist on the ending! (The ‘game’ gets an unexpected advantage to turn the tables.) Mr. DeKnight is a pretty good writer – he wrote ‘Dead Things’ (Buffy), after all, but this was just moronic. I thought Whedon knew better than this.

See, here’s the thing: ripping off a famous story only works when your characters are so established or unique that they can make it fun and fresh, put their own twist on it. Take, for example Xena. They ripped off Groundhog Day with ‘Been There, Done That’. The original was an exploration of human goodness. But Xena… bulldozed, for lack of a better word, right through the plot with her usual reckless abandon. It’s the same for all of Xena’s ripoffs of Greek myth. Or, say the Charmed ‘fairy tale’ episode. In that case, they are all completely pissed about having to deal with the whole fairy tale mess, and it’s completely hilarious. There are dozen of other examples – but they’re almost all a bit campy, and all of them depend on the characters to provide a fresh feel.

Dollhouse just can’t do that. Not while Echo is still a blank slate. And Dollhouse is possibly the least campy show I’ve ever seen. It simply doesn’t work.

More problems: The FBI guy is still boring. And is Caroline really sending him clues, like the dead father in that other short story? (Or was it a novel? I can’t remember the name… can anybody else?)

Anyway, to not be completely negative – I did like the last quarter or so, where Echo starts to remember her true identity. I was pleased to note that they seem to be going with the ‘the real self can’t be destroyed, only suppressed’ concept. And the escaped active could be very interesting. If you think about it, he is actually the good guy, on the audience’s side. He may be reacting violently, but he’s got a pretty good excuse!

And the scenes where Echo meets her handler for the first time were well done. I can’t help be wish they had waited a few episodes to reverse the “You can trust me” concept, though. Give us some time to internalize it first!

I’m not going to give up on Dollhouse quite yet, but the plot really needs to improve.

Dollhouse

February 16th, 2009 by Brianna

Dollhouse, the new Joss Whedon show, is finally here. I’m honestly not sure what what to think.

Positives:

  1. Eliza Dushku is an awesome actress. She even makes ‘completely spaced out’ entertaining.
  2. Amy Acker is only slightly less awesome
  3. The lady in charge is really creepy. If she’s really at the top on the ladder, she’ll be really interesting.
  4. The evil geek was even creepier – I really, really hated him!
  5. Eliza Dushku can really kick ass. (I’m shallow).
  6. Eliza Dushku is really hot. (Yes, that shallow)
  7. Negatives:

    1. There’s no plot. I was going to write a review of the episode, but nothing actually happened beyond introductions! It wasn’t even a realistic nothing.
    2. The FBI investigator is boring. Boring, boring, boring, and I don’t care.
    3. Echo needs an identifying personality stat!
    4. Even more, there aren’t any sympathetic characters, except perhaps the ‘handler’.
    5. The story of the episode doesn’t have any resonant meaning, since the character (the hostage negotiator) involved disappears at the end.
    6. The loss of agency theme makes me feel sick. More on this later.

    Jaclyn at Bitch Ph. D. wrote a list of questions, and Aviva at Fourth Wave added some others, so I’m going to answer them:

    From B PhD:
    2) Were you as psyched as I was to see that Mutant Enemy tag at the end?
    No. I hardly noticed it in Buffy, etc.!

    3) How did you feel about Eliza D as Faith in Buffy? How have you felt about everything she’s done since Buffy? What did you think about her performance as Echo?
    Love, love, loved Faith. I hope that the character Echo develops into is somewhat Faith-like. Tru calling was a terrible show, but Dushku was still really good in it. Echo was performed as well as could be.

    4) Why the hell did Joss agree to work with Fox again? Or ever?
    They gave him money. Nobody else would. He decided that making a show with Fox was better than no show at all. Corporate America sucks.

    5) Um… are there still no people of color who want good roles in Hollywood? It’s a real problem, isn’t it? How on earth can we fix it, so that all the producers and directors aren’t forced to only cast white people all the time? (Yes, there’s Harry Lennix as Echo’s handler, but a) that just makes him the token and b) Driving Miss Daisy, anyone?)
    I have no idea why this is so hard. Corporate America sucks. I suppose we can help it by supporting show with POC, but I’m guessing that the current bunch of executives/directors/producers/establishment will have to retire, at the very least, if we are ever to fix it.

    6) Ditto fat people, people with physical disabilities, people who aren’t freakishly pretty, etc.?
    I don’t think people who are freakishly pretty are going anywhere. I think we can redefine ‘freakishly pretty’ somewhat (both disabled and fat people can be very pretty, for instance), but I know that I’d far rather look at a pretty person on TV than one who, say, looks like me! (See positive #6 above…) Does this make me a horrible person?

    7) Did they really have to start with the girl-is-broken-due-to-sex-abuse-and-requires-the-intervention-of-a-kind-man-to-seek-redemption plotline? Why is that never the secret weak spot for male action stars, huh?
    Yes, of course they did. Because every strong woman has a history of abuse. The abuse makes them strong! Didn’t you know that? Women who have happy, un-abusive lives end up as boring housewives. (Yes, I’m very angry about this.)

    8) If Person A is desperate and out of options, and is coerced into fully giving up her agency and identity, and if, after making that one decision, Person A no longer has any meaningful ability to consent to anything, nor does she have the ability to withdraw her consent from the original agreement — under those circumstances, if Person C pays Person B money to have sex with Person A, is that really prostitution, as Joss and Eliza have said it is? Or is that sexual slavery?
    I had the impression that ‘Caroline’ was some sort of violent criminal, and they were giving her a way to avoid the electric chair. Or something. So, it somehow didn’t bother me, as a principle (Humane treatment of criminals is another issue). I am probably completely misreading this, though! Anyway, I also got the impression that Caroline was tricked – she didn’t understand what she was really signing up for. Presumably, when Echo figures it out, she’ll be pretty mad. Also, when Caroline agrees to be wiped, does she cease to exist? Echo seems to be a different person – she didn’t agree to anything! If so, she is definitely in slavery. This brings a bit of AI/existence (What defines a person? Can a person be duplicated? Transferred?) related stuff into the equation.

    In other words: Insufficient information.

    9) Can someone tell me that Joss is going somewhere good with this? I want to believe…
    We’ll he hasn’t really done anything bad yet (Dr. Horrible excluded on grounds of extreme campyness), plus the network screwed with the pilot big time, so I think that it has a chance.

    Now for Aviva’s questions:
    a) Can a disturbing premise be mitigated by the subjugated character developing agency and control over her oppressors? If so, to what degree? Does she need to escape? Seek retribution? Take over?
    It all depends on how it’s handled. I’m not a big fan of ‘vengeance stories’ – I’d like to see something bigger happen. Taking over might qualify (a la Alice in Resident Evil). Or perhaps something else.

    b) How long can a show like Dollhouse continue on with this same “she can be anything you want her to be” shtick before something has to give?

    One episode. If they don’t start making me fall in love with Echo herself in the next episode, I’m going to really dislike it. Characters make a story. They’re all that matter.

    c) Is it possible to maintain narrative interest if Echo escapes or if Dollhouse (the place, not the show) is shut down? If so, how? If not, then doesn’t the continued need for the Dollhouse as an element of narrative interest necessitate the continued exploitation of the “actives” for our viewing pleasure?

    I think they could do anything they want to. One caveat: see my answer to b) – we have to care about the characters. If Echo develops a personality, falls in love with Sierra, and they blow the Dollhouse, move to Mars and open a coffee house for pilgrims from Pluto, I’ll be happy – as long as I care about Echo! If I don’t care, whatever happens in the Dollhouse doesn’t interest me now.

    One last thing:

    Back to Negative #6:

    I can’t really explain why, but the whole concept of loss of agency absolutely terrifies me. This is true even in lesser contexts. People who are addicted to substances or gambling or sex, mob groupthink, people who are unable to perceive the societal influences that they are acting on, people who only react to their current whim, people who don’t care about the effect of their actions, etc., etc. I could never, never, never accept the idea of determinism. Belief in free will is absolutely necessary for me to function. It’s central to my morality, religion, feminism, sexuality, relationships – not to mention boring, everyday life. It was even the primary influence for the name of this blog!

    Echo doesn’t have agency, doesn’t have free will. If it was simple coercion, I wouldn’t like it, but I could live with it. Instead, she doesn’t even know she doesn’t have a choice. That makes me feel sick. Perhaps the show will explore this subject somewhat. But if they end up on the side of determinism, I’m going to be very, very angry.

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 11 – Family

February 12th, 2009 by Brianna

This episode was excellent. The best since the pilot.

It’s not perfect yet. There’s still too muck awkward dialogue, and the ending felt a bit flat (too Scooby-Dooish), but the show is really getting there.

Anyway – Kahlan really messes up this episode, and she knows it too. Richard thought he did, too. The whole thing reminded me of the Buffy episode ‘Ted’ (when Buffy kills her mother’s robot boyfriend). But Kahlan actually did kill somebody innocent. She was too eager to get justice for her friend, and it backfired.

The more the protagonists screw up, the better it gets!

Also, the detective thing actually worked. They’ve done it a couple times before; it seemed a little cheesy then, but I thought it seemed better this time. Richard make a decent Sherlock Holmes, and the Confessor=Judge+Jury+Executioner aspect doesn’t seem like a farce the way, say, the ‘legal’ scenes in Xena were.

As a whole, I’m really beginning to like the pace of the show. Sure, they’re supposed to be saving the world, but the show is more about the small, ‘everyday’ problems more than the overall plot. At least, that’s the way they’re moving. At first, there was too much urgency, too much emphasis on getting the main bad guy, (and we knew they wouldn’t kill him – otherwise, there wouldn’t be a show!) I felt this way about the Sarah Connor Chronocles – the first two episode felt more like the beginning of a movie than the beginning of a TV show. It obviously wasn’t, though. LotS is starting to even out in the same way.

Random Thoughts:

  • The side plot with Zedd’s brother was a bit – predictible. I did like that they gave so much screen time to the not so young and sexy, though.
  • Richard’s streak of failing to notice someone sneaking up behind up continues. Why didn’t the consteble kill him after he was knocked out? Was he that much more scared of Kahlan than of the D’harans?

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 10 – Sacrifice

February 7th, 2009 by Brianna

This episode begins with a cliche: “Men don’t ask for directions.”

Sigh. The creators of LotS were right when they said that the show was supposed to be like Xena, only with less campy fun. Their attempts at humor are dreadful, and we’re paying for it with characters who are harder to relate to!

Anyway, after this horrible humor attempt, the Mother Confessor shows up. Cue whining from the fans of the book. “Kahlan’s supposed to already be the Mother Confessor.” I wasn’t so keen on the MC’s acting either, but the scene worked well as a whole.

Random Thought:
Kahlan’s “stand and fight” speech would have sounded better before she found out that there were no other confessors left. As it was, it just seemed stupid. I blame the editors!

Kahlan finds out that her sister isn’t dead. Naturally, she has to find her. This was a really good idea. Back in the review of the pilot, I complained that the big emotional scene of the sister’s death fell flat. It seemed pointless to have her die when we didn’t even know who she was. But now that she’s alive, the whole thing works. Our only knowledge of this character is that she was willing to die, and that makes her interesting.

There’s more bad editing after the opening sequence. Richard’s idea just comes out of the blue, and then – whoops, here we are at the prison. Whatever.

Kahlan (or Bridget Regan, rather) looked really good as a Mord’Sith. She also seem like less of a parody in that role then the actress who played Denna.

Anyway, that trick (dressing Kahlan up as a Mord’Sith) works so well, I wonder they don’t use it more often. The whole rescue scene was very good, and just the right length. I was expecting (from the episode summary) for the whole plot to center around rescuing the sister. It was pleasantly surprising for them to walk in and rescue her so easily, and rather center the episode around the baby.

Speaking of which, I have a lot of Feelings (with a definite capital ‘F’) concerning the whole baby issue, but I’m not really sure of anything. At least it wasn’t (as I feared it would be) a PSA for or against abortion. On the one hand, the pragmatic (and supposedly moral) choice was to kill the child. On the other hand, the mother’s choice was to let him live.

Or wasn’t it a PSA? After all, Richard’s point of view (abortion is *bad*) conveniently turns out to be the ‘right’ one. And if the kid turns out to be evil, who will be right, after all? Still Richard? The world of LotS does

Good episode, though. And the fight with the evil general’s “army” (well, it was just 30 guys) was pretty cool.

They need to get a new editor, though!

Semi-Critical Reviews: Bloody Mallory (2005)

January 28th, 2009 by Brianna

Hulu is now officially my biggest waste of time on the internet, rivaled only by Afterellen.com video blogs.

Oh, well.

I just watched Bloody Mallory, a French (with subtitles!) B action movie. It was surprisingly entertaining.

Quick plot summery: Mallory got married, but her husband turned out to be some sort of demon guy, so she killed him. Now she’s a professional evil fighter who (sort of) works for the government, and she has to stop the evil Pope.

It was campy as could be, completely stupid, and lots of fun. Mallory and her (exish-)husband mutually stalk each other – he hangs around and laughs, she summons him from limbo, and quotes some sort of ‘rules for dead demon husbands’ at him. I thought this would have some sort of creepy abusive undertone, but it refreshingly did not. Maybe it did, and I just didn’t catch it (since it’s in French), but even when he convinces her to borrow his power to defeat the evil Pope, it didn’t feel creepy, just… mutually cynical.

Despite it being a B movie with a female protagonist, it didn’t feel too (s)exploitive. There’s not too much excessive cleavage, one of the evil fighters is a telepathic little girl, and Mallory doesn’t really flirt with anybody. (She does kiss the inspector guy, but he was dying…) I suppose that since nudity is allowed in French media (although they are trying to tone it down!), it doesn’t seem so titillating to make movies about women with enormous breasts who beat people up while wearing skimpy outfits (a la Faster Pussycat, Bitch Slap, etc.). Mallory’s outfit was fairly revealing, I suppose, but I didn’t feel like the camera focused on her body excessively.

And one of the main characters was a drag queen – who was actually really cool, and not played for laughs! I’m fairly certain that I’ve never seen or heard of an action movie with a drag queen in it before, although there probably is one somewhere.

But the best part was the evil Pope. Okay, okay, I’m really pissed off at a Catholic relative at the moment, and at the Catholic church in general, so I’m biased… but hey, anyone who wears a silly hat that that and thinks that they are God’s Representative must be pretty messed up!

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 9 – Puppeteer

January 23rd, 2009 by Brianna

Hey! Look who’s finally on the show! Darken Rahl, the Big Bad! He even has real lines. We find out that he’s very suave, but loses his temper easily.

But his general/assistant is *boring*.

So the terrific trio’s plan is, sneak into the castle, steal the box, distract the bad guys, and possibly kill the big bad. Except we know that can’t happen yet!

Anyway…

That was one evil little girl. And one very good one – almost to the point of silliness. This episode banked on the cuteness factor, and I think that it mostly succeeded – as far as cuteness can go, anyway.

I do believe that this is the greatest contrast between two episodes of any show I’ve seen in a long time. Last week, torture. This week, cute children. It’s just a bit disconcerting, somehow. And although they tried to make certain parts of this week’s episode all serious and such, somehow the danger factor just didn’t seem that high. Almost as if the whole thing was, well, a puppet show.

Perhaps they were trying to make up for last week’s being so miserable, but since the stakes were supposed to be even higher, I would have liked the intensity to increase similarly. Even the ending just didn’t seem all that scary, despite the head chopping and wrist slicing.

On the other hand, the fight scenes were very nice (not so over-the-top). And the episode was cleanly written and produced. I enjoyed it, even if it wasn’t very deep.

And Rachel was a very sweet little girl.

Random Thoughts:
Zedd could have used more magic earlier, and gotten the same result.

Does Kahlan not want the Darken Rahl chase to be over? I hope that the ‘one in white will betray’ prophecy wasn’t fulfilled last episode. I think that there’s still more milage to be gotten out of it.

What are they going to do with the box?

How did Darken Rahl know his comm. book was hacked?

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 8 – Denna

January 18th, 2009 by Brianna

Will the slow pan starting from the feet, while the subject buckles up her/his armor ever get old? And look – no cleavage, for once! Denna’s voice seemed a bit girlish for the part, though. I could have done without her Lara Croft hair, too – wouldn’t short hair have been more effective?

Kahlan’s dream was very well done. Her response (kissing Richard, and then leaving) made sense too, but I couldn’t help but wish that they had built up to this point a bit more gradually. It still worked very well.

I was quite surprised at how dominatrixy Denna turned out to be (especially in terms of vocabulary, etc.) Not something that I’ve ever seen on TV, certainly. Is this is a good thing or not? I don’t know – but it was certainly different! And very creepy. Not quite, say, Callisto creepy, but getting there.

It seems they could show more of Darken Rahl. I know, I know – they’re trying to make him all mysterious and such, but it’s hard care about someone who is never seen at all. I’m starting to become very curious:

How did he get to be super-evil-guy?

What’s the organization of the world, the government? How big is DR’s domain vs. the size of the world?

Are all of the evil-types directly derived from Darken Rahl – is he some sort of ultimate evil? Or his he just in charge of all of the warlords, Mord’Sith, etc. (a la the ‘Source’ in Charmed) with only a tenuous grip on power?

Is he really just a cookie-cutter bad guy, or is he more interesting than that?

Anyway, the best part of the episode, by far, was Kahlan and Zedd’s moral dilemma over the other Confessor’s enslavement of the villagers. They all agreed that the whole situation was wrong, but were willing to use the confessed if they really had to. Finally a ploy that’s really not all black and white. It seems that the whole ‘confessor morality’ issue isn’t going away, either. Excellent job.

I don’t really have very much to say about the final few scenes, except that they were very uncomfortable to watch, and that the whole dominatrix theme was played up just a little too much to be really believable. Also, where were Constance and her friends during the last fight? You would have thought they would have stuck around for extra security, instead of going to the club, or wherever they were!

In any case, LotS just became much, much darker.

Random thoughts:
In a moment of weakness, I read a bunch of the Hulu comments, and while they were mostly inane (“I love this show!” “This show sucks!”) I noticed an interesting pattern among people who are fans of the book series. They have two complaints: 1. Not enough torture and rape (thank heavens they don’t get their wish!) 2. Doesn’t exactly agree with the world mechanics and minor plot details. The latter complaint is interesting – why does it matter? Apparently Kahlan is supposed to be the last confessor, not just a confessor, Richard was supposed to stop Kahlan from kissing him, not vice versa, Kahan didn’t tell Richard what she was nearly so soon, and on and on and.

But so long as we become emotionally invested in the characters, and care about what happens to them, and as long as they tell an interesting story, does it matter? Really?

Damn fanboys!