Music, Videos, Ethics, and Content Removal

February 4th, 2009 by Brianna

Warner Music Group just screwed up big time. It seems Youtube had a contract with WMG to allow users’ use of WMG music in their videos. Also, WMG put their catalog of music videos directly on Youtube. The contract expired, WMG was greedy, and now they want all of their content deleted.

Idiots.

Everybody’s mad about it. From artists who had their videos removed, to people using WMG music in the background of a video, to the EFF, to everybody else.

Now, I’m not going to say much about the publicity/creativity stupidness of this decision. Everybody else has covered that rather throughly. (I would like to point out – the ethics of ‘content sharing’ and copyright in general is still an open question. 800 years ago, an author would have been honored that someone would want to make copies of their work!)

No, here’s why this decision is so incredibly bad: You don’t delete web content. Especially not mass amounts of web content. By rendering millions of videos useless, either by removal or muting, a large chunk of the web just went dead. And who knew – the Internet is a big place, with lots of distractions. Users who find a dead link, just drop that line of inquiry and do something completely different (Something they can actually find!) In other words, if that Beyonce video, or even, say, the hamster dancing to Metallica goes away, guess what? Ooh… shiny podcast in the next tab. Close this one! That means we’re not going to be listening to WMG content. At all. And I’m pretty sure that’s not what they wanted.

Once again – Idiots.

Semi-critical Reviews: The afterellen short film competition has too much music.

February 3rd, 2009 by Brianna

Afterellen.com is having a short film contest. I was considering reviewing all of them quickly, but most are… not so good, so I won’t (I’m trying to stay true to my ’semi-critical’ tagline.) I will say that I liked Too Much Plaid the best, despite the occasional awkward and/or preachy dialogue. At least it was unforced, the material suited to the actors.

Never mind about that. I do have something to say about all of the films:

There was too much music!

I never thought I’d hear myself say that – I am a semi-professional musician, after all! How can there be too much music? Especially if it is good music – and most of the music in these films was at least fairly good. Music makes everything better, right? (A la Jackie Primrose Monahan…)

Nope, it certainly doesn’t.

Problem #1 with music: Using it to create artificial emotion.

The writing and acting in a film must be able to create emotion on its own. The music is only useful for heightening existing emotion, not creating it! Girl Talk was the worst in this regard: I don’t know these people, I’m not identifying with them, and indie rock music isn’t going to make me care if they’re kissing! Simply having them kiss in silence would have improved it tremendously, mostly because:

Problem #2: Good music makes your average film look awful!

I used to play in a small youth orchestra. It was an informal group, and the director was more of an organizer than a musician. I was always having to convince her that having a pianist accompany the orchestra was a bad, bad idea. Why? Because the piano always sounds good! It’s always in tune, it has a good tone, and it’s usually play by an extremely competent player. In comparison, the orchestra, while quite good by itself, suddenly sounded out of tune, error prone, and generally made up of absolute beginners. It almost sounded as if we needed the piano to keep us together! Of course, if an orchestra is sufficiently talented, a piano can be a good addition – but as a member of the group, not as accompaniment.

The same thing happens with these films. Look – nobody expects them to be wonderful, but adding goodish music makes them seem worthless by contrast. In some of the worst cases, I found myself completely ignoring the picture and just listening to the music.

Perhaps I’m just in a Anyone But Me is the greatest web show ever – partly due to its economy with music – induced haze. Still, I can’t help but think that all of these films abused music. Even having no music at all would have been a great improvement.

Why I’m not reading Jezebel or wowOwow anymore

February 3rd, 2009 by Brianna

A while ago, after reading this post, I decided there wasn’t any point in reading Jezebel any more. And just now, I also deleted wowOwow from my rss reader.

I just couldn’t stand them anymore.

There didn’t seem to be any obvious reason why. The writing is good on both sites and they post about subjects I’m interested in. I read many blogs of far, far worse technical quality.

Jezebel, of course, annoys with their occasional feminist-who-aren’t-us are stupid attitude. But the above-mentioned post was merely the last straw. The real problem? They post too much crap! They post random celebrity photos, aimless, unfocused entertainment commentary, and random semi-feminist ideas, seemingly without any goal. Sure, once in a while there’s a flash of genius, but I don’t have time to wade through the crap to find it. Besides, Feministing links to almost all of their interesting stuff.

wowOwow, on the other hand, is… far too impersonal. The writers are almost (or all they all?) professional journalist/writers, and they seemingly have no idea how to write a blog. Reading wowOwow mostly just reminded me why I can’t stand to read a traditional newspaper or watch TV anymore. They occasionally post something – like the interview with Rachel Maddow – that can’t be found elsewhere, but once again, it’s just not worth the effort.

In retrospect, the trouble with both of these blogs was simply that they posted too *much*. Jezebel posts around, what, 50, 60 posts a day? And wowOwow posts around 30 – I just get the feeling that neither of them can decide what is really important or interesting, so they just throw it out there and let the reader wade through it, just like a news magazine, or the evening TV news does. Put something in there for every kind of reader/viewer, and hope you get enough right to keep people watching. But on the Internet, we can all the options on earth. We don’t have to read anything that is uninteresting.

In other words, traditional publishing techniques simply don’t work on the web! Why do they even try?

(Side note – I wonder if that’s why small volume magazines, i.e. Bitch, some of those women-in-music ‘zines, etc. are having so much trouble? Perhaps they’re still thinking in paper print terms, even when they try to move partly to the web.)