Will unemployment help reduce pay equality?

January 31st, 2009 by Brianna

Mild speculation alert!

According to the latest statistics, due to men being laid off at higher rates women now make up almost 50% of the workforce. (Thanks to Girl w/ Pen ) Now, as the Gw/P post pointed out, this is not necessarily a good thing, either for women or society as a whole.

But I do think that something very interesting could happen here. While much of the reason for this gender-unequal decrease is due to an overall decrease in male-dominated sectors (construction, etc.), there are many, many jobs being lost in other areas. Now, we know that women are paid much less on average than men. Furthermore, this pay inequality is not only caused by a larger percentage of men having jobs in higher paying fields, rather, the inequality holds true in almost every field (PDF).

If an employer is forced to lay someone off out of several who hold similar jobs, who are they going to choose – the higher paid person or the lower? Given similar work output (which is reasonable, I believe), most employers should choose the higher paid worker, who is statistically more likely to be male. This, will lead to a decrease in the gendered pay gap, at least temporarily.

The real test will come when the economy improves, pay rises, and unemployment drops. Will the men who were let go for having higher salaries be hired back at similar salaries to the women who remained? Will women’s salaries be raised? (increased relative seniority, etc.) In other words, whereas historically women have been entering, at a lower wage, into a male-dominated workforce, at some future point significant numbers of men might be entering into a (slightly) female-dominated workforce. I’m certain pay won’t become equal overnight, but hopefully things will improve.

On the other hand, non-whites are being disproportionately affected by rising unemployment. I’m not sure what the causes are, but I imagine it’s related to social inequalities. So, it comes down to: a (potential) step forward, and an (immediate) step back.

(Crossposted at Fourth Wave Feminism)

Random Link: Jill Bennett!

January 30th, 2009 by Brianna

Jill Bennett has a new website! With a blog and everything!

Squeeeeeeeee!

Sorry about that….

Anyway, her site is wonderful, but I have just one tiny little problem:

Jill, I have a raging crush on you, but must you write everything in lowercase? You’re not E. E. Cummings – he was really weird. Lowercase just makes it hard to read, and makes it seem like you’re words are very small and insignificant. Which is not like you at all!

A little rant on spoilers

January 30th, 2009 by Brianna

So there I was, sitting harmlessly in my fiction writing class, participating in an interesting discussion about symbols in literature, when someone decided to bring up Harry Potter. And what were the first words out of her mouth? “Has anyone not been spoiled?”

Sigh…

I don’t understand this. Is it really true that a person’s enjoyment of a story could be dependent on not knowing what’s going to happen? Look – there’s only one ending to any story: “They died.” It doesn’t matter whether the story goes, “She lived happily ever after in a little house on the coast,” or “He was pushed off the cliff by a pack of wolves,” the end result is the same. “and then they died.” Okay, okay – I suppose, “they lived for eternity,” is a possible ending, but that make… two? You know how the story’s going to end already! This applies to Harry Potter too – guess what! He’s going to die, either now or later.

Get over it.

And the plots in the middle aren’t much better. I once read a Dickens novel (Hard Times, I think it was), which had an introduction containing this sentiment: (paraphrased) “Nobody but a small child would read this book to find out whether the [protagonist] foils the [antagonist]. Instead, we read it for the characters, the emotional meaning.” I think that this is true of everything. Remember Shakespeare? He’s supposed to be a pretty good writer, right? (I happen to think that he’s overrated, but still…) Get an edition of his plays containing plot summaries of each play, and just read the summaries. Than go read the ’soap update’ in TV Guide. Shakespeare’s plots suck! They really do! Now, I suppose you could make an argument that they were fresh and original when they were written, but I doubt it. Fortunately, we don’t watch and read Shakespeare for the plots – in his case, it’s the language that matters. And that goes for most other books. You read Austin and Tolstoy and Alcott for the characters, Asimov for the ideas, etc., etc., etc.

That’s not to say that plot only exists to provide a vehicle for characters and language, of course. I’ll argue all day that the plot is the main feature of The Handmaid’s Tale. (It’s mostly indirectly expository, but still plot) But in order for a plot to be worth caring about, it has to stand up to scrutiny, to bear repeated readings or watchings, not fall apart when you find out the ’secret’!

So please, people, don’t be so crazy about being ’spoiled’. If it was worth seeing in the first place, it won’t hurt anything to know about it beforehand.

Note: Spoilers for games are a legitimate worry – if you know the solution to a puzzle, it’s often not as much fun. But: 1. Puzzles are usually meant to only be solved once, and 2. These sorts of games are not literature!

Semi-Critical Reviews: Bloody Mallory (2005)

January 28th, 2009 by Brianna

Hulu is now officially my biggest waste of time on the internet, rivaled only by Afterellen.com video blogs.

Oh, well.

I just watched Bloody Mallory, a French (with subtitles!) B action movie. It was surprisingly entertaining.

Quick plot summery: Mallory got married, but her husband turned out to be some sort of demon guy, so she killed him. Now she’s a professional evil fighter who (sort of) works for the government, and she has to stop the evil Pope.

It was campy as could be, completely stupid, and lots of fun. Mallory and her (exish-)husband mutually stalk each other – he hangs around and laughs, she summons him from limbo, and quotes some sort of ‘rules for dead demon husbands’ at him. I thought this would have some sort of creepy abusive undertone, but it refreshingly did not. Maybe it did, and I just didn’t catch it (since it’s in French), but even when he convinces her to borrow his power to defeat the evil Pope, it didn’t feel creepy, just… mutually cynical.

Despite it being a B movie with a female protagonist, it didn’t feel too (s)exploitive. There’s not too much excessive cleavage, one of the evil fighters is a telepathic little girl, and Mallory doesn’t really flirt with anybody. (She does kiss the inspector guy, but he was dying…) I suppose that since nudity is allowed in French media (although they are trying to tone it down!), it doesn’t seem so titillating to make movies about women with enormous breasts who beat people up while wearing skimpy outfits (a la Faster Pussycat, Bitch Slap, etc.). Mallory’s outfit was fairly revealing, I suppose, but I didn’t feel like the camera focused on her body excessively.

And one of the main characters was a drag queen – who was actually really cool, and not played for laughs! I’m fairly certain that I’ve never seen or heard of an action movie with a drag queen in it before, although there probably is one somewhere.

But the best part was the evil Pope. Okay, okay, I’m really pissed off at a Catholic relative at the moment, and at the Catholic church in general, so I’m biased… but hey, anyone who wears a silly hat that that and thinks that they are God’s Representative must be pretty messed up!

Random: The L Word Episode 6.2 Music

January 27th, 2009 by Brianna

So I just watched episode 2 of the latest (but not greatest) season of the L Word (I want more Lucy Lawless!) It was weird, stupid, and (partly unintentionally) funny, but the music was – good, for once.

For one thing, there wasn’t so much of it as there usually is. Are they out of money, or something? Still – less is more here! And the little bit they did play were rather nice. The little brass riffs during the proposal scene (Yay! For Jane Lynch) were perfect, and the electronic music for the final Shenny scene was even better.

Did ezgirl get an ear transplant? Or am I delusional from lack of sleep?

Now, if only we could get rid of that damn theme song…

Listen to this NOW!

January 24th, 2009 by Brianna

The Girls on Girls podcast (Anne Neczypor! Jackie Monahan!) just interviewed Jill Bennett and Cathy Debuono.

Go. Listen. Now. It’s the funniest thing I’ve heard all month!

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 9 – Puppeteer

January 23rd, 2009 by Brianna

Hey! Look who’s finally on the show! Darken Rahl, the Big Bad! He even has real lines. We find out that he’s very suave, but loses his temper easily.

But his general/assistant is *boring*.

So the terrific trio’s plan is, sneak into the castle, steal the box, distract the bad guys, and possibly kill the big bad. Except we know that can’t happen yet!

Anyway…

That was one evil little girl. And one very good one – almost to the point of silliness. This episode banked on the cuteness factor, and I think that it mostly succeeded – as far as cuteness can go, anyway.

I do believe that this is the greatest contrast between two episodes of any show I’ve seen in a long time. Last week, torture. This week, cute children. It’s just a bit disconcerting, somehow. And although they tried to make certain parts of this week’s episode all serious and such, somehow the danger factor just didn’t seem that high. Almost as if the whole thing was, well, a puppet show.

Perhaps they were trying to make up for last week’s being so miserable, but since the stakes were supposed to be even higher, I would have liked the intensity to increase similarly. Even the ending just didn’t seem all that scary, despite the head chopping and wrist slicing.

On the other hand, the fight scenes were very nice (not so over-the-top). And the episode was cleanly written and produced. I enjoyed it, even if it wasn’t very deep.

And Rachel was a very sweet little girl.

Random Thoughts:
Zedd could have used more magic earlier, and gotten the same result.

Does Kahlan not want the Darken Rahl chase to be over? I hope that the ‘one in white will betray’ prophecy wasn’t fulfilled last episode. I think that there’s still more milage to be gotten out of it.

What are they going to do with the box?

How did Darken Rahl know his comm. book was hacked?

Thoughts on the Inauguration

January 21st, 2009 by Brianna

It’s done. The United States has it’s first African-American president.

I’ve been slightly more excited by this whole inauguration business than I ever thought I would be. I suppose that it’s all mostly just pomp and silliness, but there’s nothing intrinsically wrong with any of that! And somehow, I really do feel hopeful – not because I think that Obama is going to somehow save the country, or singlehandedly pull us out of the recession, or even reform politics to some significant degree. I’m hopeful, more because of this.

“Most black say MLK’s vision is fulfilled”. When I first saw that statement, it bothered me somewhat. Surely, no one really thinks that everyone is being treated equally! I’m doubt that those who answered ‘yes’ on that poll really think so either. But they think that something is different. And that fact by itself will cause things to be different, to become better.

Even if that is the only impact Obama has on the world (and I doubt it will be), this alone will cause his presidency will be one of the most important in years.

Edit: Pink’s Dear Mr. President just came up on XMMS. I don’t miss Bush at all!

Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 8 – Denna

January 18th, 2009 by Brianna

Will the slow pan starting from the feet, while the subject buckles up her/his armor ever get old? And look – no cleavage, for once! Denna’s voice seemed a bit girlish for the part, though. I could have done without her Lara Croft hair, too – wouldn’t short hair have been more effective?

Kahlan’s dream was very well done. Her response (kissing Richard, and then leaving) made sense too, but I couldn’t help but wish that they had built up to this point a bit more gradually. It still worked very well.

I was quite surprised at how dominatrixy Denna turned out to be (especially in terms of vocabulary, etc.) Not something that I’ve ever seen on TV, certainly. Is this is a good thing or not? I don’t know – but it was certainly different! And very creepy. Not quite, say, Callisto creepy, but getting there.

It seems they could show more of Darken Rahl. I know, I know – they’re trying to make him all mysterious and such, but it’s hard care about someone who is never seen at all. I’m starting to become very curious:

How did he get to be super-evil-guy?

What’s the organization of the world, the government? How big is DR’s domain vs. the size of the world?

Are all of the evil-types directly derived from Darken Rahl – is he some sort of ultimate evil? Or his he just in charge of all of the warlords, Mord’Sith, etc. (a la the ‘Source’ in Charmed) with only a tenuous grip on power?

Is he really just a cookie-cutter bad guy, or is he more interesting than that?

Anyway, the best part of the episode, by far, was Kahlan and Zedd’s moral dilemma over the other Confessor’s enslavement of the villagers. They all agreed that the whole situation was wrong, but were willing to use the confessed if they really had to. Finally a ploy that’s really not all black and white. It seems that the whole ‘confessor morality’ issue isn’t going away, either. Excellent job.

I don’t really have very much to say about the final few scenes, except that they were very uncomfortable to watch, and that the whole dominatrix theme was played up just a little too much to be really believable. Also, where were Constance and her friends during the last fight? You would have thought they would have stuck around for extra security, instead of going to the club, or wherever they were!

In any case, LotS just became much, much darker.

Random thoughts:
In a moment of weakness, I read a bunch of the Hulu comments, and while they were mostly inane (“I love this show!” “This show sucks!”) I noticed an interesting pattern among people who are fans of the book series. They have two complaints: 1. Not enough torture and rape (thank heavens they don’t get their wish!) 2. Doesn’t exactly agree with the world mechanics and minor plot details. The latter complaint is interesting – why does it matter? Apparently Kahlan is supposed to be the last confessor, not just a confessor, Richard was supposed to stop Kahlan from kissing him, not vice versa, Kahan didn’t tell Richard what she was nearly so soon, and on and on and.

But so long as we become emotionally invested in the characters, and care about what happens to them, and as long as they tell an interesting story, does it matter? Really?

Damn fanboys!

Anyone But Me – Episodes 3 & 4

January 15th, 2009 by Brianna

Anyone But Me is the best web series I’ve ever seen. If it gets very much better, it might just be the best serialized film work in any medium! No exaggeration.

Episode 3 – Countdown

I am SO in love with Rachel Hip-Flores’ voice. It’s low, a little coarse, a little sexy, and a little shy – and her voice-overs are gorgeous! She even avoids sounding like an impersonal movie trailer person. It simply sounds honest and sincere. And once again, the lack of music makes it all that much more real.

The cuts between Vivian and Aster were perfect. The trying-to-hard aunt is funny without having to resort to exaggeration or silliness, and Vivian reacts to her almost exactly like I would!

The dialogue in this episode was absolutely wonderful. Some shows try to show everything, tell everything, all via long streams of pointless speech (I’m looking at you, L Word!). Others (action-oriented shows) try to minimize dialogue, and leave the audience guessing – until it all comes out at the end in one big, squishy stream! Anyone But Me avoids all this, using just the right number of words to tell us what’s happening, all without bogging down. Example: after the bike ride, she says, “Thanks for the side tour of the ‘burbs,” and we know exactly what happened (city girl’s a bit bored with the small town!) A lesser show would have shown him pointing out the sights, shown her bored reaction, etc., etc.

Again: the transition from Vivian calling Aster, to the ‘much later’ shot. The traffic noise is quiet, there’s a faint sound of crickets, she’s staring up into space. It just felt so much cleaner than the typical ‘2 hours later’ title card combined with enough ‘waiting’ shots to bore the audience.

And Aster’s coming to get Vivian was wonderfully cute!

Episode 4 – Vivian and Aster

A simple, simple episode – but just what Vivian and Aster’s relationship needed. It was sweet without being syrupy, beautiful without being L Word-style soft-core porny. Why couldn’t South of Nowhere ever do something like this?

New character Brick (I guess that’s how you would spell it!) was introduced with the show’s characteristic grace. Two or three lines were all that we needed.

The closet joke was perfectly understated. Funniest thing I’ve heard all day!

The plot was believable – amazing, considering that it was about stress on a relationship. Fictional relationships tend to be a rather dramatic. Some (soap-opera style) make all relationships seem perfect – until the big event – cheating, etc. – that drives them apart! Others (more realistic) spend forever building up to something until the final straw breaks things apart. Here there’s nothing wrong but a little distance, and a tiny bit of insensitive thinking on Aster’s part. Vivian reacts – she doesn’t overreact unrealistically, she just reacts. She’s worried about losing Vivian, wanted to spend time with her, and Vivian didn’t catch the feeling. And nobody did anything wrong – it was all a little misunderstanding. They had a small disagreement, and made up (for now, anyway). That’s not something often portrayed in a fictional relationship. Simply wonderful!

The ending song was perfect, too. And the ‘Strike TV’ lighting sound even fit in with the mood and music.