Legend of the Seeker Reviews: Episode 1-2, Prophecy-Destiny

December 31st, 2008 by Brianna

New Zealand is pretty! I’m pretty sure that I’ve seem too many shows and movies filmed there, though – I’m starting to recognize landmarks.

For the first real scene – two girls on horseback are being pursued by a bunch of soldier types in medieval armor. One girl can dodge arrows, but the other can’t, so she gets shot. I’m rather curious as to how they managed to shake the soldiers after she was shot, but hey – this show is made by a bunch of ex-Xena people, so asking for that kind of continuity is probably kind of silly!

The girl who got shot dies, and we find out that they are sisters. Now, I’m not a big fan of big dramatic death scenes early in a show, so I might be biased, but I really didn’t care at this point. Mostly, I was just wondering “why should we care?” It was a pretty obvious use of the sledgehammer method of exposition, along the lines of: THEIR MISSION IS VERY IMPORTANT! NO, REALLY! BELIEVE US!

Not great so far. Subtlety is pretty important.

The girl who can dodge arrows can also run really, really fast, apparently. (That makes sense, I suppose). She’s also fond of dramatic poses in dangerous situations… but there’s a big green wall in the way, so I suppose she can be forgiven.

A Random Thought:
Why did the entire wall suddenly appear when she ran into it? And then not disappear? Surely stuff must run into it all of the time!

I like Kahlan. Okay, okay, I’d probably like any female character who beats people up, but I really do like Kahlan. She’s rather like… Summer Glau’s Cameron (from T:SCC) + Eowyn (Lord of the Rings, but from the book, not the movie) + Emily Deschanel (or maybe her character in Bones, I’m not sure). In other words, she’s single-minded, hides her emotions, isn’t afraid to do what she needs to, and yet can still be soft and kind underneath – and she has quirky facial expressions and speech patterns.

Another Random Thought: (Which is going to return again and again…)
Kahlan is participating in a rather large range of athletic activities, riding a horse for miles, stabbing people, running for miles, too. Why on earth is she wearing that huge flowing dress? We always thought that Xena’s outfit was impractical, but this is ridiculous! Maybe she had to flee in a hurry, and she was wearing that thing already – but I rather think that somebody simply thought it would look cool.

Next Scene:

Whee! Dude with no shirt chopping logs! Complete with slow motion! Sure, I think it’s gross, but I imagine that straight women and gay men everywhere love it. Bonus points for equal opportunity objectification.

Random thought:
Lady (the cow) is the smartest character I’ve seen in a while, anywhere.

My impression of Richard was of a goody two shoes. The stereotypical perfect kid. I didn’t really like him here – thank goodness this is only the pilot!

Richard seeing Kahlan for the first time was really, really cheesy. I thought that modern TV had gotten over that kind of thing!

Anyway, after she dodges another arrow, the soldiers run Kahlan up against a cliff, and Richard (tapping into his chivalrous instincts) tries to save her. Which is a bit stupid. But Kahlan’s facial expression while Richard is arguing with the soldiers are worth it: “Who the hell is this guy, and what does he think he’s doing?”

Then she screws up and makes herself (and the writers) look stupid… but I’ll come back to this later.

In any case, Richard saves her tail, she’s ungrateful, and it’s obvious that Richard is the big damn hero. It looked to me like they did it together, with Kahlan doing most of the work, but – whatever. There’s more silliness, with them staring into each other’s eyes while romantic music plays.

Why didn’t Kahlan make sure that all of the soldiers were dead? It would have saved a lot of trouble…

I did like that Richard didn’t follow her when she told him not too. That was a nice (and unusual) touch. I expected him to chase after her, somehow.

Anyway, the plot after this is all one big stereotype after another, for a while. So Richard has a destiny, he’s a reluctant hero, his father isn’t his real father, he won’t accept aforementioned destiny, he changes his mind after his dad gets killed and his (adopted) brother rejects him, he’s going to save the world at some unspecified time. Blah, blah, blah.

In fact, this looks rather like a canned D&D plot. Hell, there’s a Gandalf style wizard (Zedd) – there’s a ranger (Richard) – and a paladin (Kahlan). A RPG adventure party. Lovely. And stupid.

I liked Zedd without reservation from his first appearance, which is more than I can say about the other characters! Nudism for the win! Also, he’s cranky, slightly insane, and plays the part of the old guy who’s usually right about stuff. I suppose he’s a stereotype, but he’s an entertaining stereotype.

Finally, the plot recovers..

After Richard’s buddy’s daughter gets kidnapped, the show start to improve. I really liked the angry peasant mob for, some reason, and the fairy saving Richard’s head was a nice touch. The evil bad guy attacking the ‘boundary’ with catapult was interesting. I expected chanting priests, or something, and was pleasantly surprised by the practicality of it all.

The evil bad guy, whose name escapes me, was so boring I’m not going to even bother to look his name up.

Richard screws up and falls for the clichéd voices, putting Zedd into a coma. This is the first time he actually makes a mistake, and I’m starting to like him a bit.

They catch up with Minor Bad Guy, and there’s a big slo-mo fight, in which Kahlan kills two bad guys easily, while Richard only beats the one by a hair. Chalk up one more cheesy “You’re the seeker!” moment. And here’s my gripe from earlier: We now see Kahlan’s combat prowess – earlier, she could have easily tossed that soldier over the cliff instead of mind-warping him. Why did she use her power so soon in the fight? It’s as if the writers hadn’t decided what she was going to be like when they filmed that scene, and really, really wanted to show us her Pinch-like Powers. Or something.

Another big fight, and more cheese for the end – I certainly hope they stop the lovey-dovey moments after this episode. It’s getting ridiculous.

In the End

The pilot was pretty silly, plot wise, but the characters are interesting and have potential. (This sounds familiar…)

That, and Kahlan’s cool (and hot!).

More Random Thoughts:

I liked what they did with the shadow book. I didn’t expect them to trash it, as it seemed like such a big deal at first! Bravo.

The Sword of Truth imparts amazing fighting and acrobatic abilities? Or is that just part of being the Seeker, along with those amazing instant leadership skills.

Kahlan needs a new weapon. Those knives just aren’t going to cut it. She needs to get some new clothes, too (No, I’m not going to drop this…)

Legend of the Seeker Episode Reviews: Introduction

December 30th, 2008 by Brianna

Legend of the Seeker is a new syndicated TV show by some of the minds that were behind Xena – Sam Raimi, Robert Tapert, and others. I found out about it while searching for (what else) Xena podcasts. This site had a discussion about LOTS, with the author comparing it to Xena rather strongly. Given that: A. I’m hopelessly obsessed with Xena and B. I’m a sucker for anything with a strong female protagonist, I thought I would give Legend of the Seeker a chance.

I wasn’t disappointed. The pilot was good, for a pilot, although I felt I would have enjoyed it more had I been familiar with the books (by Terry Goodkind). The second episode was better, as they usually are.

Now that I’ve seen all seven of the released episodes – thank you Hulu – I’m hooked. It’s no Xena yet (and it likely won’t ever be…), but it’s a good, solid, interesting show. Compared to other fantasy/sci-fi show currently on, I’d put it as a good deal better than Sarah Conner, and almost as good as Battlestar. Given that that the latter is ending soon, LOTS will soon be the best show gracing the fiber-optic network infrastructure.

So, in the spirit of Internet Fandomship, I’m going to try and review Legend of the Seeker episodes. I’ll try and do about one episode a day until I’ve caught up – hopefully in time for the next one to be released!

Realism in Film: Anyone But Me

December 19th, 2008 by Brianna

Most TV and film works are not very realistic. Action, sci-fi, and fantasy pieces are obvious culprits – they constantly break the laws of physics! Comedies aren’t much better. In every comedy, the number of jokes per second is drastically increased over the real world; that’s why they call it comedy. Police, forensic, and law shows feature the protagonists solving problems completely impossible to their real-life counterparts. Typical ‘realistic’ dramas depend on coincidences, ‘plot twists’, unrealistically eloquent dialog, and lots of two-dimensional characters for the real characters to bounce off of. And so-called ‘reality’ shows are perhaps the most unrealistic of all.

Of course, there is a reason for all of this – real life is boring! We watch movies and TV shows to escape for reality or discover new insights about reality, not to see reality in its realistic boringness. So, common sense would say that few works will ever be really realistic, if the authors want anybody to watch it.

That said, I’ve always wanted to see something that is really realistic, that derives its insight not from plot contrivances (however subtle), not from ‘interesting’ characters, but by having a unique perspective on realistic situations. I suppose there are a few fictional ‘documentaries’, but I haven’t ever seen one that wasn’t overly bland.

So, I was excited after seeing the first two episodes of Anyone But Me. The first thing that I noticed was, that nothing really happens! Here’s the plot, spanning around fourteen minutes: There’s this girl. Her dad has a lung problem, thanks to being a firefighter during 9/11, so they have to leave New York. They move, she misses her girlfriend. She meets some new people.

The dialog is mostly rambling and information-sparse, just like real speech. A large amount of time is spent just watching her sit, or walk, thinking. That’s all there is too it!

Yet, somehow, it’s not boring. The characters are wonderful. I found myself was identifying with Vivian from the first 20 seconds; I really cared about what was happening to her. The slow pace is mostly just relaxing. After all, that’s often the pace that reality takes, especially when are going through a major life change. And the music, or rather the complete absence of music, allows the story to take place without distractions.

It’s basically the anti-soap opera. Soaps depend on crazy events, dramatic music, and insane characters to hold our attention. Anyone But Me seems to be relying on the absence of the above to tell us a story that we can really understand, really learn from.

Anyone But Me is off to a wonderful start. I hope they keep the mood they have set in these first two episodes, and resist the urge to turn it into another South of Nowhere!

Semi-Critical Reviews: The Arbiter Chronicles – Contents Under Pressure

December 17th, 2008 by Brianna

The Arbiter Chronicles is (are?) one of the most interesting and original works I’ve found on the Internet. The Arbiter Chronicles is a ‘radio’ drama about a bunch of people on a spaceship. It is written in the style of an old fashioned radio show, but the content is hardly old-fashioned. Plotwise, it’s really more like Star Trek than anything else – they fly around, find weird situations on planets, and pick fights with aliens. Unlike Star Trek, it’s not boring! (Okay, okay, so I don’t like Star Trek – sue me.) The characters are varied and interesting, and the plots original, if fairly cheesy. The best thing about the Arbiter Chronicles, though, are the settings. There are worlds of genetically engineered humans who look down on ordinary humans. The ordinary humans still live on Earth and are highly religious. There is a race of highly intellectual people (I’d give the names, but I don’t think that I can spell it!) who can read minds and have developed a sort of shared consciousness. There are several others, too – and none of them feel like parody or exaggeration for it’s own sake. You get the feeling that they are real possibilities – some horrible, some interesting, some wonderful, but still amazingly real.

Anyway, I meant to talk about the latest episode, not review the whole series!

Contents Under Pressure

Overall impressions:

I really like the new music. The old music was just too cheesy and synthy, even for a campy radio show! The new sound effects are also much better – although the engine rumble made my head hurt sometimes. I think that this is one of the best episodes, plotwise, yet – the ending surprised me, and nearly all of the characters developed in new and interesting ways. Even the annoying ones!
Read full post »

Random computer thought – PSU Ring

December 13th, 2008 by Brianna

In case someone should find this useful…

It’s common knowledge that the power supply on a computer is usually the source of any strange ringing sound. However, one usually expects that the ring would appear under load – i.e. increased power = increased ring.

I just found a PSU that doesn’t ring under a small amount of load, using the integrated video card. When I installed a video card, it rang as long as the card was idle. When I put the card under load, it stopped. I thought it was the video card or the PCI-e interface. Guess what! It was the PSU. It only rang in a small power draw range.

The moral of the story: If you have a ringing computer, it’s probably the power supply, no matter how irrational the observed behavior!

Update: Replacing the power supply seems to have fixed all of my problems with JACK xruns, too – go figure. (if you don’t know what that means, just ignore it…)

The Last* Word on Subtext in Xena

December 12th, 2008 by Brianna

(*Yeah, right!)

And now for something completely frivolous!

Xena fans have expended an astonishing amount of effort on analysis of lesbian subtext. Is it really there? How intentional is it? How much of it is there? Let’s make a complete list of every possible subtext moment in every single episode! Let’s make subtext the whole point of the show, and interpret every single phrase out of context! Let’s declare that that scene/line/episode never happened, because we don’t like the implications it has on X&G’s relationship!

Now, don’t get me wrong – there is nothing wrong with any of this. In fact, it’s amazing what we have accomplished – the fan fiction alone is absolutely amazing. And I certainly appreciate the need to re-imagine something in order to identify with it. But in the end, I like to think that the authors’ story is, well, the real story! Call it artistic integrity, if you will. (I’m guessing that my classical music background has a lot to do with my opinions on this subject – ‘composer’s original intent’ and all that.)

Anyway, I’m going to try and write something that I haven’t seen yet – an analysis of Xena subtext that is completely canon. (Excepting, of course, the intentionally out-of-character comic moments.) It will consider all of the relationships, and try and ‘connect the dots’ in a reasonable way. In other words, it’s the story, told as I would have wanted to see it, without ignoring what was actually written. And as a bonus, it’s yet another take on the Xena chronology; I make no claims as to accuracy.

So, here goes!
Read full post »

A mathematical solution to the door holding problem

December 11th, 2008 by Brianna

It seems strange that such a simple custom as holding a door open for someone should cause as much trouble as it does. It started out as a highly gendered, benevolent sexist activity (men holding doors for women). Later, feminists began to reject the door holding custom along with many other benevolently sexist actions, leading many to refuse to allow a man to hold a door for them at all. More recently, door holding seems to be a relatively gender neutral activity, with women and men holding doors for each other, irrespective of gender. (Except in a dating context…)

So – common courtesy, or sexist holdover? I know almost nothing about etiquette, but the scientist part of me has come up with a rather different solution…
Read full post »

Friends

December 6th, 2008 by Brianna

Normally I like XKCD very much. It smart, funny, unoffensive, and original. And, it ran the ‘how it works‘ strip, quite possibly the coolest webcomic panel ever.

I really didn’t like XKCD’s most recent comic, though. Here’s the joke:

  • Guy likes a girl.
  • Guy’s scared of rejection, so he becomes friends.
  • In the hopes that she will become attracted to him
  • Punchline: In the meantime, he disapproves of her relationships.

Ha. Ha.

So, here’s the problem with modern inter-gender relationships: Everybody seems to think that the purpose of interacting with the other gender is to find a mate. Yes, everybody has a few opposite gender friends, but rarely as many as same-gender friends, and rarely are the friendships as significant. Also, even people who have lots of opposite-gender friends are often just trying to improve their chances! (I’m basing this mostly on personal observation and a few studies, so I could be wrong here, but I think it seems about right). Worse yet, when combined with the tendency of women to not make any real same-gender friends at all (see the book Girlfight, etc.), and you have this weird situation where men are friends with: A. Girlfriend/Spouse, and B. “The Guys”, and women are friends with: A: boyfriend, and B: Nobody.

Now perhaps I’m biased – as a lesbian, I’m not exactly interested in a romantic relationship with man. Still, the above seem incredibly absurd, regardless of orientation. In fact, I think that a good deal of gender problems are caused by this – when everyone sees the other gender as ‘other’, as nothing but potential sex partners, then a communication breakdown is inevitable.

The comic would be great if it was making fun of the tendency to see others in that way. Instead, it’s just making fun of the guy – “Ha, ha, stupid! Just ask her out and then get over it…” In other words, girls aren’t for friends, just sex.

Economic stimulus is bad: or, why the two major parties suck

December 4th, 2008 by Brianna

As I believe I’ve said before, I support both the Green Party and the Libertarian Party. Here’s why:

For last week, most of the economic talk has been about either the pending auto industry bailout, or Obama’s purposed new stimulus plan. (And the fact that we are now ‘officially’ in a recession, but that’s not a policy question.) Everybody has their own opinion on these two plans. Most of the liberals say that the auto industry bailout is just the same thing that was done for the financial industry, except that the auto industry counts as ‘main street’, so now, it’s okay. The stimulus plan is supposed to have the same effect as the tax refund – increase spending, and get the economy ‘moving’. The difference? It’s supposed to be better, because the states will have more control of the money. The conservative answer to all of this? “Where’s the money going to come from.”

They’re all wrong.

Yes, I realize I simplified in the above paragraph. But here are the problems with the above plans:

The auto bailout: Cars are wasteful and horrible. The use immense amounts of resources to manufacture. They pollute the environment. They use huge amounts of energy. An electric car, which is at least not polluting directly (there is, of course, coal and nuclear pollution!) likely uses more energy than a gasoline car! Americans buy cars far more often than we need too – leading to even more waste. And cars kill a tremendous number of people during operation! We don’t need more cars. That money would be much better spent in finding way to help people avoid needing cars, not to prop up a mismanaged industry. Find some other way to help the auto employees.

Of course, we needed the wall street bailout even less than we needed this one, but two wrongs don’t make a right.

Economic Bailout. We don’t need to spend more! Spending is what got us into this mess to begin with. Americans consume more per capita than any other country, and that is:

1. Unfair and exploitive, and

2. Impossible to sustain without resorting to force, to keep the other countries giving us stuff for free.

What we need is to consume less, and keep the percentage of the population who consumes a disproportionate amount of value from doing so. More spending is not the answer!

I wish that, instead of the Democratic and Republican parties being the two major parties, that the Libertarian and Green parties were the major parties. I think that they would balance each other out nicely.

Here’s what the Libertarian Party has right:

  1. Small government. The smaller, the better.
  2. Economic theory. supply and demand really does work out. Debt is a bad thing.
  3. Military isolation. We have absolutely no business playing world policeman.

And the Green Party?

  1. Social policy. The government exist the serve the people – and especially those who are being exploited.
  2. Economic practice. Those with power (capital), abuse that power, and all the free markets in the universe can’t stop that.
  3. General foreign policy. Fair trade. The idea that the world does not revolve around the US.

I think it would be a great improvement if the power were to shift to those two parties, rather than the present state.