The US contains Great Insanity: Militants

October 11th, 2008 by Brianna

Most people have heard about paranoid, fundamentalist, my-home-is-my-castle militant people. You know, the type that lives on a farm and stockpiles food and ammunition. Some of them are insane anarchists, some are just afraid of the government or Y2K, and some are actually cult members. Some of them are just individual families, and some are entire groups. But there aren’t very many of them, and they’re pretty crazy. They shouldn’t be hard to recognize. They’re certainly not something that most people should have to worry about.

Right?

Right?

Wrong.

Now, I live in the Midwest. I have talked to a few number of people from the coasts who seem to think that the Midwest is full of crazy, gun-toting idiots, but I can assure you that this is not the case. Sure, people here are a bit more conservative than elsewhere (well, much more in some areas..), but are generally quite sane and reasonable. Or so I thought…

Earlier today, I was conversing with some friends. They’re quite typical evangelicalish Christians – pretty much par for the sort. I had thought that the oldest daughter of one family was even rather feminist leaning – in any other family she would certainly have been an activist type. And all of them are intelligent, not bigoted, not obsessed with silly obsolete church rules. Fairly reasonable people, I had thought.

During the course of the conversation, she (the daughter) was telling a funny story, and casually mentioned that they were carrying pistols at the time. I thought that this seemed odd, and asked, if they were hunting at the time. She responded that they always carried pistols – it was part of their ‘family security’.

I was rather… taken aback, to say the least. It wasn’t just her family, either. On asking more questions, the situation became clear: It seems that after 9/11, a large number of otherwise normal conservative families became scared for their safety. Rather than cowering in fear and voting for Bush, they bought guns for every person, and started acting like insane anarchist militants (And they still voted for Bush, too…)

They call it ‘tactical living’, I believe. This ‘tactical living’ includes training every member of the family to use a pistol, running an endless variety of emergency drills, creating protocols for every situation to ensure security, and generally assuming that people are always trying to kill them, and making sure that they shoot them first.

Sooner or later, someone’s going to get shot. And it won’t be a terrorist.

Now, I’m actually in favor of private ownership of weapons (with limitations, of course), but these people are utterly insane. The strangest part, though, is that they are not like the stereotype of insane militants. They’re just ordinary families who have reacted to the post 9/11 world by arming themselves. It’s not just an isolated case, either – it’s a growing movement, according to my friend.

I don’t really have an overall point to this – don’t trespass, I suppose – but mostly I was just surprised and shocked at all of these people, who are so prepared to kill for whatever reason.

An Aside:

They all just love Sarah Palin. I suspect that her penchant for hunting is the overriding consideration. The aforementioned daughter, particularly, has a rather obvious repressed-lesbian crush on her. It’s quite frightening, really.

What’s up with speeches these days?

October 8th, 2008 by Brianna

I just finished taking the stupidest test I have ever taken. It was for a public speaking class – and rather than have any thing to do with public speaking, the test was over a bunch of arbitrary concepts like “What are the differences between beliefs, values, standpoints, and attitudes.” and “What are the different ‘levels’ of communication” I know, I know, nobody cares, including me.

But being angry about this stupid (required) class and its stupid picky rules caused me to think about real public speaking – especially politicians.

So: Random Opinions on Public Communication

Read full post »

Bridget’s new thang – The Jam, also thoughts on Fringe

October 4th, 2008 by Brianna

Bridget:

Bridget McManus is really cool. She’s funny, smart, sexy, etc., etc. Brunch with Bridget is cool, she does amazing stand-up shows. She even has a funny blog.

She’s got this new ’show’ - it’s really a sort of infomercial for this site called ‘PeopleJam’. It’s sort of a cross between a social network and a self-help site. It’s really dumb. I can’t even figure out what the real point of the site is – it seems to mostly be reviews of boring self-help books.

I sure hope that Bridget is just doing this ’show’ for money/recognition, and that she’s not actually working on the site itself.

Her segment is pretty funny. She’s got another stuffed animal, and the whole thing seems quite tongue-in-cheek. So, it’s worth watching – because it’s Bridget, after all – but can’t she find something else?

Fringe:

Fringe is a new show on FOX. it’s made by JJ Abrams, who did Lost. This might or might not be a good thing. I personally don’t care for Lost, but hey…

Fringe show is kind of like the X-Files, but with a female lead, and a mad scientist.

It’s really pretty cool. The basic premise is: Weird things happen. Olivia tries to figure out why. The scientist guy helps. His son get mad at him. There may be odd plot twists in the future.

It does seem strange that the mad scientist is personally responsible for almost all of the problems – but they may have fixed that with the latest episode. The angry son is annoying, so I don’t really like him. The mad scientist is pretty cool/funny. They need to give the sidekick/agent-in-training more lines.

I like that Olivia never has any backup (the son is only really there to take care of Dad) – it’s the individualist in me, I suppose. I like that every episode ends with a big chase scene, and that those scenes never seem difficult or problematic for Olivia – they just don’t make a big deal out of it. If they keep doing chase scenes every ep., though, it might get a bit boring.

I also like the 3D screen text – I’ve never seen anything like that before.

So, Fringe is fun, but not completely amazing, not yet. It does have potential.

Random thoughts on the debate:

October 4th, 2008 by Brianna

Debates are slow; I only read the transcript afterwerds.

Gwen Ifill would probably make a better VP than either of these two.

Why is Palin so casual? “Can I call you Joe?”

I wish that politicians would actually answer the questions they are asked.

Palin rambles. And why is she still saying ‘hockey mom’? It’s getting old.

Why does it matter whether Global Warming is artificially produced or not? If it’s bad, we still ought to fix it.

Why doesn’t anybody get offended when people say ‘man-made’? Is it because ‘man-made’ has a negative connotation?

Everybody’s foreign policy sucks.

Israel is our best ally in the Middle East… because we put them there!! *Sigh*

Is there anybody who doesn’t want change? No? I thought not. So, can we stop talking about it already?

Biden played the ‘When I was growing up, America was a wonderful place. Now, it’s eeevvvil” card. Bah

I hate politics.

Life (the TV show, that is) – new season

October 3rd, 2008 by Brianna

Why is this cop show called Life, anyway?

I guess it refers to the whole Zen thing that the lead character does. People seem to think that the Zen thing is really interesting and unusual for a TV show – or at least for a cop show.

Whatever. I don’t get Zen, anyway. Although, I read Zen and the Art of the Trumpet once, and it didn’t improve my playing – so maybe I’m just bitter.

Back to Life, nobody (or nobody cool, anyway!), cares about the Zen cop guy, because Sarah Shahi is on the show, playing the Zen guy’s partner. Shahi, of course, is one of the most beautiful women on earth, and an awesome actor, who makes any show she touches better. (And yes, I still miss Carmen…)

Seriously (as one can be about a TV show, anyway), though, Life is pretty cool. I usually hate cop shows. All those CSI shows, etc., or whatever, they all seem to be the same. Life is not really about the cop procedure thing, though. Charlie (the Zen guy) is trying to find out who framed him, Dani (Shahi’s character) is having drug problems – I suppose most shows try to do that, but Life actually gets you to care about the characters. That’s something most shows of any sort don’t manage.

But the coolest part of Life?

Dani sits on tables. And on the backs of chairs. All the time. Who sits on the back of a chair in an office? That’s something that sports jocks, and other people who hate chairs do. Not office dwelling people. I guess that it’s supposed to show that she’s less formal and uptight than the other cops, or that she’s nervous or something. (And after writing that, I realized, wouldn’t those two be mutually exclusive?) Or perhaps TV cops sit on tables all the time, and I just never noticed, because I don’t watch cop shows.

It just looks cool. Seeing Dani sit on a table just gives me this warm feeling, as if the world must not be too awfully bad if some people don’t feel the need to actually sit in their chairs.

That was a weird thing to say, wasn’t it?

Sarah Shahi rocks.