SheWired is finally here. It’s kind of a humbug.

October 31st, 2008 by Brianna

I was going to write about nothing but politics until the election – but I can’t seem come up with anything! I think I’m just burned out on politics (can’t we just vote already?). So instead, I’m going to bitch about the world of online professional lesbians!

SheWired.com launched this week, the new home of all things Jill Bennett and Cathy DeBueono, and… lesbian media destination? It’s like they’re trying to out afterellen afterellen, except all of the non-Jill content is cloned from LesbiaNation! Great idea, folks! (Not)

The site itself reminds me a bit of good old OurChart – it’s really nebulous and busy, but finding the actual content is a big chore. The one (potential) bright spot is the forum – since it’s new, and there is a pre-existing audience, maybe it will turn out to be interesting. (That’s the only problem with afterellen – the forums are really boring!)

Anyway, they tried, but I’m disappointed. When it was announced, I was under the impression that it was something that Cathy and Jill and some of Cathy’s friends (she named names at one point, I think) were putting together on their own. That would have been pretty cool. Instead, it’s an extension of here! network’s existing stuff – and the quality suffers as a result.

Oh, well.

An aside: Why, in the name of professional lesbians everywhere, doesn’t anyone give Tellofilms some love? It’s basically a lesbian youtube – they seem willing to foot the bill for hosting, and it’s easy to use, and fast (youtube clone, like I said) Afterellen and Shewired and TheSmokingCocktail and everyone else should put their stuff on there! (But that likely wouldn’t please the parent companies, now would it?)

Another aside: I just used a record number of parentheticals in this post, didn’t I? (Yes, yes, I did!)

Write to Marry Day: also for the anti-gay!

October 30th, 2008 by Brianna

Write to marry day logo

Here’s a fun blog game that’s actually worth while! Write to marry day.

Now, I believe that I’ve already given my opinion on marriage in general – I think that the government should stay out of it, and leave it as a personal or religious statement. But here’s the thing – if the government is going to define and regulate marriage, it must be available for gay people.

It’s not a moral issue.

It’s not an ethics issue.

It’s not going to ‘undermine the family and hurt the children’ – even if gay marriage were somehow magically detrimental to the family, around half of all people are divorced! The family is already dead.

Now, I’m sure that those of us who are gay, gay-friendly, etc. already know this; we’re already voting no on the appropriate issue. So here’s something for anyone who might read this who might think that being gay is unnatural or morally wrong:

If you think that being gay is wrong, you probably think that adultery and fornication is morally wrong. Are those illegal? (Adultery is grounds for divorce – but little else) Should they be? No, they shouldn’t – we don’t like it when the government legislates morality! How is gay marriage different? Nobody is forcing you to marry someone of your own sex. Your life will not be affected. But think about this: There are thousands of people out there who aren’t allowed to receive benefits on their partner’s medical plans, who should. They are denied the right to be a part of a dying loved one’s care. They are denied tax benefits that others receive. The list could go on and on.

By not allowing gay marriage, the government is saying, “Look, there is something wrong with that group of people!” The government is telling people what is right and wrong. There is not obvious consensus, like there is with, say, murder. Do you want the government doing this. Next, it will be saying that something you do is wrong. Go ahead and believe, preach, try to convince people whatever you want to about gay marriage. But please don’t vote to have the government force people to behave a certain way.

Vote no on 8, 102, and whatever other amendments!

Random Libertarian Thoughts: I hate this country!

October 28th, 2008 by Brianna

I consider myself a libertarian. I’m pro-free market, as long as it’s really fair and is working, I’m very anti big government, and I’m socially liberal. But after I went through the candidates on the sample ballot yesterday, I’m now quite angry at the libertarian party. Or, maybe not the party per se, but at least with all of the members of the party who are running for office in my area!

Here are my problems:

  1. Abortion. I was under the impression that the libertarian position was, “It’s morally ambiguous, so the government should let everyone make their own decision.” Apparently, the local candidates never thought about it that way. Every. Last. One. is pro-life!
  2. Gay Marriage. Okay – I’d much rather be working to abolish all government recognition of marriage, but if we’re going to have it at all, gay people must absolutely have it too. Guess what the candidates say? They’re in favor of a federal marriage amendment! Legislating by Constitution! That’s about as un-libertarian as you can get.
  3. ‘Family/Moral Values’ This isn’t really am issue, just something they like to blab about. Morality is yet another subject that I thought libertarians believed should be left to the individual. Not these guys. It’s like they actually meant to run for the Constitution Party, or something!
  4. Economics. Some of the local candidates are pretty much clones of the GOP here. (WTF are they even doing in this party anyway?). The others are old-school hard core libertarians. They’re completely Laissez Fair, etc. Now, I respect that position, but I don’t think it’s practical. So, why aren’t there any candidates who hold a more moderate view?
  5. Illegal immigration. They’re all against it. Libertarians should be pro-immigration. I would understand if the more isolationist ones were, well, isolationist, but why all of them?

In the end, I think that the only issue I agreed with most of them on, was the war in Iraq! (The policy is get out as fast as possible, if you didn’t know).

That was it! I think that this is really horrible. What on earth happened to the old Libertarian Party, anyway?

So as far as I can tell, the only party left with any sense is the Green Party (Yes, I’m a Classical Liberal who likes the Green Party. This is a contradiction. I’ll explain some other time!)

Therefore, this country sucks.

QED

A blog is meme is a meme is a meme…

October 26th, 2008 by Brianna

So, apparently, there’s this thing called a blog meme, sort of like a chain letter with blogs. If this happens too much, I’ll have to ignore them – they’re really silly – but I’ll do this one. It’s not like I have anything better to do…

Thank you, mzbitca, for getting me to succumb to this temptation. And, since she actually tagged Fourth Wave Feminism, where I also blog, go there NOW, and read something intelligent!

Anyway, here’s the meme:

Read full post »

Webcomics: Punch an’ Pie

October 26th, 2008 by Brianna

Punch an’ Pie is probably my favorite webcomic that is currently updating. (Demonology 101 is my favorite of all time…) Punch an’ Pie is the sequel to the wonderful Queen of Wands, both written by a woman named Aeire.

The most interesting thing about Aeire’s work – all of it – is the sheer exuberance with which it is done. The main character of Punch an’ Pie is Angela. She’s weird, overly excited, and childish, when she’s not miserable over messing something up. She’s just so much fun to watch, and that’s really the entire point of the strip.
Punch an’ Pie is supposed to be a slice-of-life comic, and it succeeds in this wonderfully. It’s light on plot – the only major change is her breaking up with her girlfriend. But it’s not a gag-a-day comic. On the contrary, the characters gradually morph and change, much in the same fashion that real people do. Angela is a little more mature, a little different, a little better in some ways, and a little worse in others, than when she first appeared in Queen of Wands. And, since Aeire’s not really trying to make a point or force exciting soap opera-style plots, it feels natural.

I guess the best way I can describe Punch an’ Pie is: it’s a friendly comic.

Webcomics: Angels2200

October 25th, 2008 by Brianna

Angels2200 is a comic that really shouldn’t be be as good as it is. The basic premise: It’s the year 2200. People have colonized the solar system. Nearly all males die from some kind of disease, but the sudden loss of testosterone hasn’t stopped the government from waging useless war.

My initial reaction to the comic, especially considering that it was written by two men, was, “Oh, come on! This is just a bad excuse to write a comic about lesbians without letting male readers feel rejected!” But when I finally managed to start reading it (I was bored), I found that it works surprisingly well. Sure, there’s lots of gratuitous skin, and some very silly storylines (West Side Story? On a military spaceship? Really?), but it is more than made up for by the quality of the characters. They are relateable, mostly realistic (for a comic, anyway), and somehow, I find myself really caring about what happens to them.

Angels 2200

The main relationship of the show is between ‘Kid’, a stereotypical French girl, and ‘Hammer’, who is not living up to her father’s war hero legacy. (Those are their callsigns – they have real names, too!) Kid is completely naive, a Pollyanna type. Hammer is rather cautious and reserved, and as her commanding officer, doesn’t want to take advantage of Kid – who is clueless about Hammer’s affection. The whole thing comes to a head when Hammer sacrifices herself to save the others. I was shocked when they did this! Webcomics never kill off the most popular character. But they did, and it worked amazingly well. (It looks like they might bring her back, though. I don’t know if that will lessen the impact of her death, but we’ll see.)

The other characters are interesting, too. The captain is tough, smart, and makes quick decisions that are usually right, and her second-in-command/maybe-love-interest is pretty cool too. The only character I really don’t like is ‘Quetz’, basically a stereotypical bitch who can’t seem to learn. We keep thinking she’s going to start acting nice, but she keeps acting like a jerk. After a while, it just doesn’t make sense anymore.

Angels2200 is also one of only two webcomics (that I know of) with a live-action short film based on it! (The author is a director/screenwriter, and made it himself on zero budget.)

Webcomics: Alpha Shade

October 24th, 2008 by Brianna

It’s probably not an understatement to say that Alpha Shade is the most visually beautiful comic on the Internet. As far as I know, it may be the most beautiful comic in print as well. It’s drawn in a mild anime style, and each page is almost like a painting. The colors are perfect, the lines clean and varied, the characters wonderfully drawn. The only complaint about the art that I have, is that in the first chapter the characters look too young, but even that flaw was quickly fixed.

The story is fascinating as well. The characters are unique and detailed, the setting has a rich history, and the plot seems to be interesting and complicated, without being confusing.

And this leads me to the problem with this comic. The plot only seems to be interesting. In reality, we really haven’t seen enough of it to really tell! Alpha Shade moves very slowly. It’s partly a function of the art. The pages are so intricate, that they take a long time to produce, and each page contains much less story than a page of most other comics. This makes Alpha Shade rather frustrating to read – it’s been around five years since it started, and we still don’t really understand what’s going on!

It’s definitely worth looking at for the art alone, though. The discerning reader might be better off waiting until each book comes out – it would be less frustrating.

But stay away from the podcast. The authors may be good writers and artists – but they are rather rude and annoying to listen to. They tend to criticize without reason, and are generally whiny and intolerant. It’s just best to stick to the comic.

Webcomics: Misfile

October 23rd, 2008 by Brianna

I hadn’t planned on writing about this comic, but then this post came up on AE, so I decided to write about Misfile instead.

Misfile is a pretty good example of the weirdness that you can get in a webcomic. The basic idea of Misfile is this: There’s a pot smoking angel. He gets high, screws up some heavenly files, and gets kicked out of heaven before he can rectify the situation. As a result, a boy get turned into a girl, and a girl loses the last year. Silliness ensues. When I first found the comic, I thought it would be pretty stupid – and there are lots of pointless jokes about feminine hygiene products, not to mention the rather regular ‘Oops, I forget I had boobs!’ jokes.

But ignoring the juvenile humor, the comic actually works rather well. Somehow, the author has managed to present the weirdness of the situation in a way that’s believably humorous without making it completely unbelievable. I suspect that the author’s wife/gf (I can’t remember which, she handles the business end of the site) acts as ‘girl talk editor’, and when the strip is not so good, it’s because she missed something.

It’s not perfect. The girl who lost the year sometimes acts out of character, and the stories are often rather boring, especially the ones involving the pot-smoking angel. Also, the angel has a brother who is very, very annoying, and not funny at all. The strip is certainly not one of those ‘must read’ sorts – the characters are not particularly easy to relate to, so the strip fails to really hold my attention. Still, the odd plot ideas and the well-thought out semi-lesbian relationship that has been developing make it fairly unique.

In reference to the AE post, this is a pretty good example of a male writer writing queerish characters and doing an okay, but not perfect, job.

Oh, and I actually enjoy the car race scenes – and I really, really hate cars. That’s got to be worth something!

Webcomics Week! First up: Sluggy

October 21st, 2008 by Brianna

For lack of any other inspiration, I’m making this week webcomics week for my blog.

(I think there’s actually a official webcomics week, too, but who cares…)

I discovered webcomics in a rather interesting way, particularly in light of my ideas on linking. I used to play a funny little game called ADOM. ADOM had a usenet group (if you don’t know what that is, don’t ask). One of the regulars on the group was a woman named Frances Moffat, and she had a website, with a little webcomic called Random Scratchings. She also had links to several other, bigger webcomics. I was hooked immediately.

When I was younger, I used to love newspaper comics, but when I was about 6, we moved, and the paper in the new town didn’t have comics. As I got older, I also found the newspaper comics to be boring and repetitive, and I’ve never liked comic books. But I always missed the newspaper comics I read as a very young child. Now, I don’t know whether the comics back then (it hasn’t been very long!) were better, or if I’m just nostalgic, but webcomics captured that childhood feeling all over again. And this time, the comics were actually good!

The most wonderful thing about webcomics, is that there are so many of them, and that they are generally free. This means that you can go from comic to comic until you find the ones that you really like. And regardless of your tastes, there’s almost certainly a comic out there that fits it (whether it’s being updated or not, is another question, though!). Webcomics are a fascinating medium.

So this week, I’m going to go through a few comics that I like, and ramble about them for a while.

The first comic I’d like to look at is called Sluggy Freelance. Now, if you know anything about webcomics, you’ve probably heard of Sluggy. It’s one of the ‘big three’ webcomics (the others are PVP and Penny Arcade). PVP and Penny Arcade are just like regular comic strips – there’s a joke every day, the characters don’t change, and they are generally rather light and fluffy. They are also rather computer geek oriented strips – PA in particular is focused on video games. I don’t read either of them – if I want geek humor, I’ll read User Friendly.

But Sluggy is different. It started out as a humor strip – but it had a plot, of sorts, right from the beginning. The jokes are rarely of the stupid juvenile variety (except when we laugh at the characters who think that such a joke is funny), but are reasonably clever. As the strip continued, the storylines became more intricate. There are several parodies, three of Harry Potter, one of Alien (the alien, Alyee, becomes a main character), and two generic horror movie parodies. Some of the storylines even border on serious, even tragic, but even the more serious stories always keep a sense of humor. This keeps the strip from developing a ‘very special story’ feeling that humorous media frequently has when treating serious subjects.

The overall feeling of Sluggy is one, not of a ‘comic strip’ type story, but of a brilliant, insightful story that takes place in a rather humorous universe.

Sluggy is not perfect. Sometimes, the jokes aren’t funny. Sometimes, the strip make no sense. But there are mad scientists, a violent rabbit (in the Monty Python tradition), a rather homicidal Santa, a brainwashed assassin, demons, the aformentioned alien, and evil corporations! All at once! So it’s definitely worth the time to read, if only for the uniqueness of the strip.

Emergency Pants!

More stereotypical characters, please!

October 18th, 2008 by Brianna

How many times have you heard or read these phrase: “<Random strong female character> is a good character because she’s strong without giving up her femininity.” or maybe, “It’s good that <random female character> isn’t just a male character in a woman’s body, because that is boring and stereotypical.”

I can’t seem to come up with any links to this kind of thing right now, but I keep hearing this kind of talk, over and over again – especially when I’m discussing something like Buffy with male friends. I just have one question: When has this ever been done? When have we seen a ‘male character in a female body’, and where can I find it?

Alien? Terminator? Ripley/Sarah Conner are cast in a mother role.

Alice or Jill in the Resident Evil series? Maybe. Some of Elizabeth Moon’s characters? I suppose.

I’m sure that there are more examples, but I think that we can agree – such characters are very, very rare.

Now, I love the complex, wonderful characters that are created when strong female characters are ‘done right’ i.e., not stereotypes. I wouldn’t have Buffy, or Ripley, or Xena, or Elizabeth Bennett, or whomever written any other way. Writers should strive to create complex, well-rounded characters of all genders. Sometimes, however, it just doesn’t happen. And sometimes, I’m just not up to digesting a complex, realistic character – I just want something simple. And stereotypes, ideals, are important to out cultural mythmaking…

But, where are these stereotypes? It seems like even the toughest female action-oriented characters resort to seduction on a regular basis. (c.f. Max from Dark Angel, Xena) And those that don’t are still supposed to be sympathetic to family members, spouses/boyfriends, starving orphans, etc, to a degree unheard of by their male counterparts. We wouldn’t want them seeming any less female, now would we? And if they are less female, they’re invarabily evil.

So here’s what I want:

I want a female western hero, Lone Ranger style. The kind that comes into town on a big white horse, defeats the bad guys, and rides of into the sunset. No weird former relationships, no serious love intrest, no noticeable weaknesses.

I want a female James Bond clone. Not an Alias-type female spy, but the whole masculine-fantasy Bond. Suave, perfect gentleperson, yet an amazing detective and fighter, who has an astonishing sense of luck, inept sidekicks, and who gets all the girls without trying, but who remains cooly detached throughout. For even more bonus points, make her straight and give her feminine, ‘woman in a man’s body’, male love interests.

(Side note: why is it that male characters often have love interests that are weak and girly, but female characters always dispise and reject weak male love interests, only accepting those that are close to their quality?)

I want a female buddy comedy. Baby Mama doesn’t count. It couldn’t have been made with male characters.

I want a romance movie with the roles reversed. Completely. Enough said.

I could go on and on.

We probably won’t ever get any of these things. There’s been such a rejection of cliched characters of any gender, that nobody’s going to try anything this different, but I can wish! Still…

The male ideal stereotype, the ‘White Knight’ if you will, is still pervasive in the culture. Even if modern fictional characters tend to be less idealistic, less heroic, the ideal is still there, and the modern characters still approximate it, even if they remain human. By refusing to create female characters who embody the masculine stereotype, even the strongest women will invarabily be compared, not to that stereotype, but to the existing feminine stereotype. This tendancy leads to a rejection of certain roles for women and men in real life. By denying this stereotype, we essentially deny half of human expression for half the human race.

And let’s not even start on feminine male characters…

(Crossposted from Fourth Wave)